D. M. Barch, M. G. Berman, R. Engle, J. H. Jones, J. Jonides et al., CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Working Memory, Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol.288, issue.5472, pp.136-152, 2009.
DOI : 10.1126/science.288.5472.1835
URL : https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/article-pdf/35/1/136/5439826/sbn153.pdf

T. S. Braver, The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol.16, issue.2, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010

T. S. Braver, J. R. Gray, and G. C. Burgess, Braver Gray Burgess, Variation in Working Memory, pp.76-106, 2007.

T. S. Braver, A. B. Satpute, B. K. Rush, C. A. Racine, and D. M. Barch, Context Processing and Context Maintenance in Healthy Aging and Early Stage Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type., Psychology and Aging, vol.20, issue.1, pp.33-46, 2005.
DOI : 10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.33

M. B. Brown and A. B. Forsythe, Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol.25, issue.3, pp.364-367, 1974.
DOI : 10.1214/aoms/1177698418

W. Brown, Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities, Br. J. Psychol, vol.3, pp.296-322, 1910.

M. Buhrmester, T. Kwang, and S. D. Gosling, Amazon's Mechanical Turk, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol.11, issue.2, pp.3-5, 2011.
DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.515

G. C. Burgess, J. R. Gray, A. R. Conway, and T. S. Braver, Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.140, issue.4, pp.674-692, 1037.
DOI : 10.1037/a0024695

C. S. Carter and D. M. Barch, Imaging Biomarkers for Treatment Development for Impaired Cognition: Report of the Sixth CNTRICS Meeting: Biomarkers Recommended for Further Development, Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol.70, issue.1, pp.26-33, 2012.
DOI : 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.02.031

J. C. Caruso, Reliability Generalization of the Neo Personality Scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol.9, issue.2, pp.236-254, 2000.
DOI : 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90238-K

C. H. Chatham, M. J. Frank, and Y. Munakata, Pupillometric and behavioral markers of a developmental shift in the temporal dynamics of cognitive control, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.58, issue.1, pp.5529-5533, 2009.
DOI : 10.1080/02724980443000214

L. J. Cronbach, Essentials of Psychological Testing, 1949.

L. J. Cronbach, G. C. Gleser, H. Nanda, R. , and N. , The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles, 1972.

L. J. Cronbach, N. Rajaratnam, and G. C. Gleser, THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY???, British Journal of Statistical Psychology, vol.16, issue.2, 1963.
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1963.tb00206.x

M. J. Crump, J. V. Mcdonnell, and T. M. Gureckis, Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a Tool for Experimental Behavioral Research, PLoS ONE, vol.22, issue.3, 2013.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410.t001
URL : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410

B. Diedenhofen and J. Musch, cocron: a web interface and R package for the statistical comparison of cronbach's alpha coefficients, Int. J. Internet Sci, vol.11, pp.51-60, 2016.

T. Egner, Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, vol.7, issue.4, 2007.
DOI : 10.3758/CABN.7.4.380

L. S. Feldt and R. L. Brennan, Reliability, Educational Measurement, pp.105-146, 1989.

L. S. Feldt, D. J. Woodruff, and F. A. Salih, Statistical Inference for Coefficient Alpha, Applied Psychological Measurement, vol.29, issue.1, pp.93-103, 1987.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.17.12.684

L. Germine, K. Nakayama, B. C. Duchaine, C. F. Chabris, G. Chatterjee et al., Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.107, issue.5, pp.847-857, 2012.
DOI : 10.1073/pnas.0913053107

J. M. Gold, D. M. Barch, C. S. Carter, S. Dakin, S. J. Luck et al., Clinical, Functional, and Intertask Correlations of Measures Developed by the Cognitive Neuroscience Test Reliability and Clinical Applications for Schizophrenia Consortium, Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol.29, issue.1, pp.144-152, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a006987

G. Gratton, M. G. Coles, and E. Donchin, Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.121, issue.4, pp.480-506, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480

J. R. Gray, C. F. Chabris, and T. S. Braver, Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence, Nature Neuroscience, vol.12, issue.Suppl., pp.316-322, 1014.
DOI : 10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00361-6

D. J. Hauser, N. Schwarz, D. Henderson, A. B. Poppe, D. M. Barch et al., Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants, Behavior Research Methods, vol.4, issue.1, pp.400-407, 2011.
DOI : 10.1287/mksc.4.3.199

K. Jimura, H. S. Locke, and T. S. Braver, Prefrontal cortex mediation of cognitive enhancement in rewarding motivational contexts, Proc. Natl. Acad, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00178-2

M. J. Kane and R. W. Engle, The role of prefrontal cortex in workingmemory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective, Psychon. Bull. Rev, vol.93758, pp.637-671, 2002.

P. Kline, A Handbook of Test Construction Psychology Revivals: Introduction to Psychometric Design, 2015.

C. Lehle and R. Hübner, On-the-fly adaptation of selectivity in the flanker task, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.15, issue.4, 2008.
DOI : 10.3758/PBR.15.1.135

G. D. Logan, N. J. Zbrodoff, A. W. Macdonald, V. M. Goghari, B. M. Hicks et al., When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task, Memory & Cognition, vol.76, issue.3, pp.166-174, 1979.
DOI : 10.1037/h0027242

A. Miyake, N. P. Friedman, M. J. Emerson, A. H. Witzki, A. Howerter et al., The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex ???Frontal Lobe??? Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis, Cognitive Psychology, vol.41, issue.1, pp.49-1000734, 1999.
DOI : 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734

J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 1st Edn, 1967.

J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd Edn, 1978.

A. R. Otto, A. Skatova, S. Madlon-kay, and N. D. Daw, Cognitive Control Predicts Use of Model-based Reinforcement Learning, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol.27, issue.2, pp.319-333, 2015.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0068210

J. D. Ragland, C. Ranganath, D. M. Barch, J. M. Gold, B. Haley et al., Relational and Item-Specific Encoding (RISE): Task Development and Psychometric Characteristics, Schizophrenia Bulletin, vol.110, issue.1, pp.114-124, 2012.
DOI : 10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.15
URL : https://academic.oup.com/schizophreniabulletin/article-pdf/38/1/114/16704117/sbr146.pdf

T. S. Redick, Cognitive control in context: Working memory capacity and proactive control, Acta Psychologica, vol.145, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.010

T. S. Redick, J. M. Broadway, M. E. Meier, P. S. Kuriakose, N. Unsworth et al., Measuring Working Memory Capacity With Automated Complex Span Tasks, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, vol.28, issue.3, pp.164-171, 2012.
DOI : 10.1027/1015-5759/a000123

L. L. Richmond, T. S. Redick, T. S. Braver, T. Manly, J. Andrade et al., Remembering to prepare: the benefits (and costs) of high working memory capacity ltm: an R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses Oops! " : performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. J. Stat. Softw. Neuropsychologia, vol.4197, issue.35, pp.1764-1777, 1997.

D. R. Rogosa and J. B. Willett, DEMONSTRATING THE RELIABILITY THE DIFFERENCE SCORE IN THE MEASUREMENT OF CHANGE, Journal of Educational Measurement, vol.49, issue.4, pp.335-343, 1983.
DOI : 10.1080/00220973.1981.11011781

H. E. Rosvold, A. F. Mirsky, I. Sarason, E. D. Bransome, L. H. Beck et al., A continuous performance test of brain damage Accounting for cognitive aging: context processing, inhibition or processing speed?, J. Consult. Psychol. Neuropsychol. Dev. Cogn. B Neuropsychol. Cogn, vol.20, issue.13, pp.343-350, 1080.

T. A. Salthouse, Contributions of the Individual Differences Approach to Cognitive Aging, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol.72, issue.1, pp.7-15, 2016.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x

D. Servan-schreiber, J. D. Cohen, and S. Steingard, Schizophrenic Deficits in the Processing of Context, Archives of General Psychiatry, vol.53, issue.12, pp.1105-111201830120037008, 1996.
DOI : 10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830120037008

C. Spearman, The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things, The American Journal of Psychology, vol.15, issue.1, pp.72-101, 1904.
DOI : 10.2307/1412159

C. Spearman, M. E. Strauss, C. J. Mclouth, D. M. Barch, C. S. Carter et al., Correlation calculated from faulty data Temporal stability and moderating effects of age and sex on CNTRaCS task performance An automated version of the operation span task, Br. J. Psychol. Schizophr. Bull. Behav. Res. Methods, vol.33758, issue.37, pp.271-295, 1910.

L. Wilkinson, Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations., American Psychologist, vol.54, issue.8, pp.594-604, 1999.
DOI : 10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594
URL : http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-54-8-594.pdf

P. Yin, F. , and X. , Assessing the Reliability of Beck Depression Inventory Scores: Reliability Generalization across Studies, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol.9, issue.6, pp.201-223, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/BF01173381