L. G. Allan, A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgement tasks, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, vol.15, pp.147-149, 1980.

L. G. Allan and H. M. Jenkins, The effect of representations of binary variables on judgment of influence, Learning and Motivation, vol.14, issue.83, pp.90024-90027, 1983.

L. G. Allan, S. Siegel, and J. M. Tangen, A signal detection analysis of contingency data, Learning & Behavior, vol.33, pp.250-263, 2005.

L. B. Alloy and L. Y. Abramson, Judgements of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.108, pp.441-485, 1979.

F. Blanco, H. Matute, and M. A. Vadillo, Contingency is used to prepare for outcomes: Implications for a functional analysis of learning, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.17, pp.117-121, 2010.

M. J. Buehner, P. W. Cheng, and D. Clifford, From covariation to causation: A test of the assumption of causal power, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.29, pp.1119-1140, 2003.

A. Catena, A. Maldonado, and A. Cándido, The effect of the frequency of judgment and the type of trials on covariation learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol.24, pp.481-495, 1998.

P. W. Cheng, From covariation to causation: A causal power theory, Psychological Review, vol.104, pp.367-405, 1997.

P. W. Cheng and L. R. Novick, Covariation in natural causal induction, Psychological Review, vol.99, pp.365-382, 1992.
DOI : 10.1037//0033-295x.99.2.365

D. J. Collins and D. R. Shanks, Momentary and integrative response strategies in causal judgment, Memory & Cognition, vol.30, pp.1138-1147, 2002.

J. De-houwer, S. Vandorpe, and T. Beckers, Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgments than on causal judgments, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.60, pp.418-432, 2007.

S. D. Hannah and J. L. Beneteau, Just tell me what to do: Bringing back experimenter control in active contingency tasks with the command-performance procedure and finding cue density effects along the way, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.63, pp.59-73, 2009.

H. M. Jenkins and W. C. Ward, Judgement of contingency between responses and outcomes, Psychological Monographs, vol.79, pp.1-17, 1965.

D. A. Lagnado, M. R. Waldmann, Y. Hagmayer, and S. A. Sloman, Beyond covariation: Cues to causal structure, Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation, pp.154-172, 2007.

H. Matute, Human reactions to uncontrollable outcomes: Further evidence for superstitions rather than helplessness, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.48, pp.142-157, 1995.

H. Matute, S. Vegas, and P. J. De-marez, Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, vol.28, pp.714-725, 2002.

H. Matute, I. Yarritu, and M. A. Vadillo, Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience, British Journal of Psychology, 2010.

G. H. Mcclelland, Nasty data: Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis, Handbook of Research Methods in Social Psychology, pp.393-411, 2000.

S. C. Musca, M. A. Vadillo, F. Blanco, and H. Matute, The role of cue information in the outcome-density effect: Evidence from neural network simulations and a causal learning experiment, Connection Science, vol.22, pp.177-192, 2010.

J. C. Perales, A. Catena, D. R. Shanks, and J. A. González, Dissociation between judgments and outcome expectancy measures in covariation learning: A signal detection theory approach, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.31, pp.1105-1120, 2005.

J. C. Perales and D. R. Shanks, Models of covariation-based causal judgment: A review and synthesis, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol.14, pp.577-596, 2007.

R. A. Rescorla and A. R. Wagner, A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement, Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory, pp.64-99, 1972.

M. A. Vadillo and H. Matute, Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol.60, pp.433-447, 2007.

M. A. Vadillo, R. R. Miller, and H. Matute, Causal and predictive-value judgments, but not predictions, are based on cue-outcome contingency, Learning & Behavior, vol.33, pp.172-183, 2005.

E. A. Wasserman, Attribution of causality to common and distinctive elements of compound stimuli, Psychological Science, vol.1, pp.298-302, 1990.

E. A. Wasserman, S. F. Kao, L. J. Van-hamme, M. Katagari, and M. E. Young, Causation and association, The psychology of learning and motivation, vol.34, pp.207-264, 1996.