HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

The foot-in-the-door technique, crime, and the responsive bystander: A field experiment

Abstract : A bystander’s reaction to a theft following a foot-in-the door (FITD) technique was observed in a field setting. An experiment was conducted in the pavement area of a bar where a first male confederate was seated alone with his suitcase on the ground. In the FITD condition, the confederate asked a participant for the time, thanked him/her, and left to go into the bar. In the control condition, no initial verbal contact was displayed, and the confederate just left to go into the bar. About 20 seconds after the first confederate had left to go into the bar, a second male confederate arrived, looked carefully around him, took the first confederate’s suitcase, and then left the place. More participants intervened in the FITD condition to stop the theft (84 per cent) than in the control condition (47 per cent). Social responsibility activation was used to explain these results, which has significant implications for encouraging public involvement in crime prevention.
Document type :
Journal articles
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [29 references]  Display  Hide  Download

Contributor : Laurence Leroux Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, January 30, 2019 - 11:36:27 AM
Last modification on : Monday, December 13, 2021 - 12:02:26 PM


Files produced by the author(s)


  • HAL Id : hal-01999856, version 1


Nicolas Guéguen, Angélique Martin, Fabien Silone, Alexandre Pascual. The foot-in-the-door technique, crime, and the responsive bystander: A field experiment. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, Palgrave Macmillan, 2016, 18 (1), pp.60-68. ⟨hal-01999856⟩



Record views


Files downloads