Judges’ perceptions of expert reports: The effect of neuroscience evidence - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Journal Articles International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Year : 2018

Judges’ perceptions of expert reports: The effect of neuroscience evidence

Valérie Moulin
  • Function : Author
Caroline Mouchet
  • Function : Author
Tessa Pillonel
  • Function : Author
G.-M. Gkotsi
  • Function : Author
Bernard Baertschi
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 1016146
Université de Genève = University of Geneva
Jacques Gasser
  • Function : Author
Benoît Testé
  • Function : Author
  • PersonId : 1044780
Laboratoire de Psychologie : Cognition, Comportement, Communication

Domains

Humanities and Social Sciences Psychology

Benoît Testé  : Connect in order to contact the contributor

https://hal.univ-rennes2.fr/hal-02083096

Submitted on : Thursday, March 28, 2019-4:56:34 PM

Last modification on : Friday, September 30, 2022-11:26:51 AM

Consult the full text

Dates and versions

hal-02083096 , version 1 (28-03-2019)

Identifiers

Cite

Valérie Moulin, Caroline Mouchet, Tessa Pillonel, G.-M. Gkotsi, Bernard Baertschi, et al.. Judges’ perceptions of expert reports: The effect of neuroscience evidence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2018, 61, pp.22-29. ⟨10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.09.008⟩. ⟨hal-02083096⟩

Export

BibTeX TEI Dublin Core DC Terms EndNote Datacite

Collections

UNIV-BREST UR2-HB UNIV-RENNES2 UNIV-RENNES LP3C IBSHS
55 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More